Skip to main content

Reflections on the Old Testament: Ecclesiastes



In Ecclesiastes chapter two, and, indeed, all throughout this book, the Preacher is searching for happiness and the meaning of life. His conclusion, that “all is vanity,” seems morbid, and has, unfortunately, repelled many Christian from a proper study of Ecclesiastes.

As it turns out, a proper study of Ecclesiastes reveals the Preacher’s ultimate conclusion, which is considerably brighter. Observe some key phrases in Eccl. 2, as the Preacher “tests his heart with pleasure” and seeks to “gratify his flesh”—one predominant phrase is “I made myself…” and various forms thereof. The result of these “tests” is summarized in verses 10-11:

“Whatever my eyes desired I did not keep from them. I did not withhold my heart from any pleasure, for my heart rejoiced in all my labor; and this was my reward from all my labor. Then I looked on all the works that my hands had done and on the labor in which I had toiled; and indeed all was vanity and grasping for the wind. There was no profit under the sun.” (NKJV.)

We can infer, from these verses, that his heart was temporarily satisfied, but a deeper contemplation revealed the vanity of it all. He continues with many morbid musings over wisdom and folly, the meaning of life, etc.—continually making reference to the “labor of his heart,” when, rather abruptly, in verse 24, he says this:

“Nothing is better for a man than that he should eat and drink, and that his soul should enjoy good in his labor. This also, I saw, was from the hand of God.” (See also Eccl. 6:3, 7.)
I am inclined to believe that the sudden reference to the soul rather than the heart is of great importance in this context. In short, the Preacher spends a tremendous amount of time and energy testing his heart and flesh with every form of pleasure imaginable, and acquires a vast assortment of material possessions, and, for a moment, his heart rejoices, but then it succumbs to despair once more as he contemplates the futility of it all—that he must die, as all others, and leave his wealth to another, and his wisdom will be forgotten. Therefore, what profit has he? What advantage, when his life is over? But in verse 24, he contemplates that which is from the hand of God: the enjoyment of the soul, and the wisdom, knowledge, and joy which He gives to those who are good in His sight. And who is good in His sight? Only those who have delivered their souls to Him to be washed in the blood of the Lamb! And these do not seek the gratification of their heart and flesh, which is futile, but the gratification of their spirit, which is sanctified by and joined to God. They live, now, not for self, but for God, who is eternal. In this there is profit and purpose! In this there is joy! Cast aside the pleasures and temptations of the flesh, which are temporary and lead only to destruction, and pursue the joy of serving the Lord, who has secured your soul for an eternity with Him!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Abortion

The essential question regarding the issue of abortion is this: can the unborn be properly considered human and are we therefore under an obligation to protect them? If this can be answered, we can begin to consider the social and political issues surrounding abortion. The Nature and Rights of the Unborn Human rights are contingent on being human—something that has always been implicit, but never fully defined except in the sphere of philosophy or in a strictly biological sense. In the past, a clear definition wasn’t necessary, because no one was thinking about existence before birth or what makes us different from machines and so forth. As science has progressed, however, we’ve been forced to consider our own humanity because of how deeply we understand our biology, including our development from a fertilized egg, and of how frequently in science the lines between material and abstract existence are blurred. Ethics in science aside, abortion is probably the most notable scenario...

A Brief Review of Descartes' Method

Over the Christmas break, I was finally able to finish Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method . It’s a very short book and I have no excuse for taking half a semester to finish it, except that I usually tried to read it as I waited for my class to begin and was often interrupted or distracted. It was Descartes who first sparked my interest in philosophy as a teenager, and I was excited to finally read his most famous work in its entirety. I read an excerpt of it several years ago but was never able to find the complete work in any bookstores and never bothered to order it. Early last year, my favorite used bookstore added a philosophy section and I eagerly snatched up the only copy of Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Related Writings. True to form, it wasn’t until much later in the year that I actually sat down to read it. I remembered the fascination that Descartes had held for me in high school and I wondered if this book would live up to my expectations, or if, as I was prone ...

Avatar vs. Princess Mononoke: Why Miyazaki Did It Better

When it comes to pop culture trends, I consider myself a cautious follower. I like to wait a little to see if a trend will last long enough to be worth my time, but I eventually hop on the bandwagon, which makes me an objectively uncool person: not cool enough to be a trendsetter and not cool enough to ignore trends altogether. But when it comes to film, I’m especially lazy. By the time I got around to Stranger Things , almost everyone I knew had already seen it. I watched Game of Thrones long after the final season was released and then only through a heavily censored, abbreviated series of YouTube videos. And by the time I watched Squid Game I already knew half the plot from the memes alone. (Incidentally, memes are my primary motivation for watching most shows.) Regarding James Cameron’s Avatar , my laziness is a little more understandable since I was eight years old when it was released and I still hadn’t recovered from the shark scene in Finding Nemo. As I got older, I felt ...