Skip to main content

Reflections on the New Testament: The Book of Acts

“…Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men with the same nature as you, and preach to you that you should turn from these useless things to the living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them, who in bygone generations allowed all nations to walk in their own ways. Nevertheless, He did not leave Himself without witness, in that He did good, gave us rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness,” Acts 14:15-17, NKJV.

It is a little acknowledged fact that God allows the nations to walk in their own way. In so doing, God removes His divine government from them, leaving the nations in a state of spiritual anarchy and moral disintegration. Outside of God, there is but one spiritual force that retains power over the sons of man: namely, evil. If God then removes His government, the government of Satan is all that is left (as long as God’s hand is upon a nation, Satan has no power to corrupt it). To “walk in their own way,” as used in this context, is to walk apart from God—to walk, in short, with the devil. But, while He may withdraw His government, God does not hide Himself—and in what is God’s divine nature more clearly shown than in the good things of this earth? “The living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them,” retains power over all these things, even when He has cast off the nations, and those to whom it has been given to understand the mystery of the gospel will see the “rain from heaven and fruitful seasons” as divine blessings, and seek the merciful God who bestowed them. Readily does the world receive the blessings of creation and blindly partakes of the “food and gladness” without recognizing them as God’s witness—how can they, if they are blind to their own debauchery, see any distinction in the marvels of creation and wonder at its message? Nevertheless, those whom God has foreknown will see, therefore the witness remains. Moreover, these “foreknown” shall become themselves witnesses, as the following verses so beautifully express:

“The God of our fathers has chosen you that you should know His will, and see the Just One, and hear the voice of His mouth. For you will be His witness to all men of what you have seen and heard,” (Acts 22:14-15, NKJV).

 

“But none of these things move me; nor do I count my life dear to myself, so that I may finish my race with joy, and the ministry which I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify to the gospel of the grace of God,” Acts 20:24, NKJV.

And indeed, why ought we, as Christians, to count our lives dear to ourselves? All men die—by the grace of God, we are rescued from the second death. In what light, then, are we to view this fleeting vapor of a life, after which we are assured an eternity in paradise? Not dear, to be sure! Not a crown, but a cross. If we have been assured salvation, then our lives are no longer our own, but God’s. Who are we to presume peace, security, and blessings in this life, when our eternity is Paradise purchased with the blood of our Savior, the Son of God? How can we count our life dear, when Jesus Christ made His wretched—that we might not cling to this cursed earth as those with no hope, but, rather, “finish the race with joy, and the ministry received from the Lord Jesus”? “To live is Christ, to die is gain.” We cannot serve God as He wishes to be served if we demand a say in a life that is not ours and a reward for a work we have not done. In the words of Anne Bronte, “Shall I with joy Thy blessings share, and not endure their loss? Or hope the martyr’s crown to wear, and cast away the cross?” The reward will come—but the race must be run first. When complaints arise, self-pity, etc., only recall: not your life, but His. Not a crown, but a cross.

 

“But he said, ‘I am not mad, most noble Festus, but speak the words of truth and reason,’” Acts 26:25, NKJV.
The Word of God is both truth and reason—but to the world, blinded as they are by the lies of the devil, it must ever be madness. How clear, how sensible, is the Word of God to those who have ears to hear! Every facet of Scripture is consistent with the very laws of the universe—every passage convicts, searches, and provokes as only truth can do—even so, to those who have neither ears to hear nor eyes to see, it is only madness and folly. God grant that we may speak His Word without embellishment or selfish motive, that we may be able to say in good conscience “we speak the words of truth and reason”—but beyond this, God must govern who is to receive the Word and who is not.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Abortion

The essential question regarding the issue of abortion is this: can the unborn be properly considered human and are we therefore under an obligation to protect them? If this can be answered, we can begin to consider the social and political issues surrounding abortion. The Nature and Rights of the Unborn Human rights are contingent on being human—something that has always been implicit, but never fully defined except in the sphere of philosophy or in a strictly biological sense. In the past, a clear definition wasn’t necessary, because no one was thinking about existence before birth or what makes us different from machines and so forth. As science has progressed, however, we’ve been forced to consider our own humanity because of how deeply we understand our biology, including our development from a fertilized egg, and of how frequently in science the lines between material and abstract existence are blurred. Ethics in science aside, abortion is probably the most notable scenario...

A Brief Review of Descartes' Method

Over the Christmas break, I was finally able to finish Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method . It’s a very short book and I have no excuse for taking half a semester to finish it, except that I usually tried to read it as I waited for my class to begin and was often interrupted or distracted. It was Descartes who first sparked my interest in philosophy as a teenager, and I was excited to finally read his most famous work in its entirety. I read an excerpt of it several years ago but was never able to find the complete work in any bookstores and never bothered to order it. Early last year, my favorite used bookstore added a philosophy section and I eagerly snatched up the only copy of Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Related Writings. True to form, it wasn’t until much later in the year that I actually sat down to read it. I remembered the fascination that Descartes had held for me in high school and I wondered if this book would live up to my expectations, or if, as I was prone ...
We expect a certain degree of accomplishment, of success, and of joy in life, and work for the same--but to what end? For there are some among us who do not believe in eternal consequences, or eternity of the individual at all. I read recently that "without the belief of immortality, virtue cannot exist." Presumably because, if there are no eternal consequences to an individual's actions, that individual might do as he/she pleases in the moment, and give no regard to the needs or desires of his/her fellow man. Virtue is contingent upon self-denial--it is not selective kindness, that is, doing good as long as it is convenient, but giving up oneself for the express goal of enriching another person. Without belief in immortality--that is, immortality of the soul--it would not matter if another person were enriched or not, since all must die in the end, and the virtuous person will receive no reward for his/her actions. That is the skeleton of the idea, anyway. I am not sayin...