Skip to main content

Notes on 2 Corinthians

“Do you look at things according to the outward appearance? If anyone is convinced in himself that he is Christ’s, let him again consider this in himself, that just as he is Christ’s, even so we are Christ’s,” 2 Cor. 10:7, NKJV.

“…But they, measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise. We, however, will not boast beyond measure, but within the limits of the sphere which God appointed us….” 2 Cor.10:12-13, NKJV.

The danger among Christians is the tendency to glorify one’s faith as an individual as a mark of superiority. We know that our core belief is absolutely true—that is, the gospel of Christ—but are wont to extend that sense of absolute truth into all areas of our life, so that we become more or less convinced that because we are correct in our belief of Christ, we are correct in all things. Are our political beliefs guided by our belief in Christ? Certainly. Are our domestic habits guided by our belief in Christ? Absolutely. Any diligent Christian may attest to these things. But, reader, we are still human. As Christians, our common ground is Christ because He is the Absolute, but in our earthly affairs, while we are guided by that Absolute, our vision of the universe and its workings is still blurred, and we are liable to fall.

Paul’s admonition to the Corinthians is to be cautious in judging other believers based on one’s own convictions. If you are Christ’s, good—but remember that I also am Christ’s. One learns little about oneself by comparing oneself only with likeminded persons. Know that God has placed you in one position, and your brother in another—you do not see all that is to be seen, nor does he. When you examine a fellow believer, examine his core belief first. Does he confess Jesus Christ as the Son of God, Lord and Savior? Does he hold the Bible as the holy and inerrant Word of God? Then do not be too quick to denounce his personal convictions. Do not “look at things according to the outward appearance.” If a brother’s habits do not quite suit you, if his manners do not please you, if his political beliefs do not quite match yours, he is still your brother if he holds the basic tenets of Christ’s gospel as truth, and you must treat him as your brother. You are both Christ’s. In those other, extraneous, temporal circumstances, either you or he are liable to be wrong or right or neither. Lay the absolute truth of Christ as your foundation, meet on that ground, and build upwards.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Abortion

The essential question regarding the issue of abortion is this: can the unborn be properly considered human and are we therefore under an obligation to protect them? If this can be answered, we can begin to consider the social and political issues surrounding abortion. The Nature and Rights of the Unborn Human rights are contingent on being human—something that has always been implicit, but never fully defined except in the sphere of philosophy or in a strictly biological sense. In the past, a clear definition wasn’t necessary, because no one was thinking about existence before birth or what makes us different from machines and so forth. As science has progressed, however, we’ve been forced to consider our own humanity because of how deeply we understand our biology, including our development from a fertilized egg, and of how frequently in science the lines between material and abstract existence are blurred. Ethics in science aside, abortion is probably the most notable scenario...
4 comments
Read more

A Brief Review of Descartes' Method

Over the Christmas break, I was finally able to finish Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method . It’s a very short book and I have no excuse for taking half a semester to finish it, except that I usually tried to read it as I waited for my class to begin and was often interrupted or distracted. It was Descartes who first sparked my interest in philosophy as a teenager, and I was excited to finally read his most famous work in its entirety. I read an excerpt of it several years ago but was never able to find the complete work in any bookstores and never bothered to order it. Early last year, my favorite used bookstore added a philosophy section and I eagerly snatched up the only copy of Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Related Writings. True to form, it wasn’t until much later in the year that I actually sat down to read it. I remembered the fascination that Descartes had held for me in high school and I wondered if this book would live up to my expectations, or if, as I was prone ...
2 comments
Read more
We expect a certain degree of accomplishment, of success, and of joy in life, and work for the same--but to what end? For there are some among us who do not believe in eternal consequences, or eternity of the individual at all. I read recently that "without the belief of immortality, virtue cannot exist." Presumably because, if there are no eternal consequences to an individual's actions, that individual might do as he/she pleases in the moment, and give no regard to the needs or desires of his/her fellow man. Virtue is contingent upon self-denial--it is not selective kindness, that is, doing good as long as it is convenient, but giving up oneself for the express goal of enriching another person. Without belief in immortality--that is, immortality of the soul--it would not matter if another person were enriched or not, since all must die in the end, and the virtuous person will receive no reward for his/her actions. That is the skeleton of the idea, anyway. I am not sayin...
1 comment
Read more